Rattled Ruddock replies in the Guardian

In the thick of it!

“it is standard parliamentary practice to abstain when negotiating in private with your own leadership in an attempt to get them to change their minds.”

Really?
Quite a difference from what she wrote in her letter to Lewisham Central residents only a month ago:

“I have always acted with integrity and stuck to my principles – voting against the government going to war in Iraq.”

Like this:

Be the first to like this post.

This entry was posted on April 25, 2010 at 6:37 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Rattled Ruddock replies in the Guardian”

Chris Says:
April 25, 2010 at 10:14 pm | Reply
This is “always acted with integrity and stuck to my principles”.
She seems to have failed to explain how abstaining on the vote counts as “voting against the government going to war in Iraq”
Max Says:
April 25, 2010 at 10:31 pm | Reply
Indeed.
She abstained.
You know, it’s standard practice…

http://bit.ly/9QqKNh